Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM-5.3

Compare published specifications, vendor API list prices and measured Borg performance. Both models are included in Borg.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

1,000,000 tokensContext window
2640 msMedian time to first token (gateway proxy)
76.7Output tokens per second (whole turn)
—Request success
$2 / $10Vendor API price in / out · per 1M

GLM-5.3

1,048,576 tokensContext window
7293 msMedian time to first token (gateway proxy)
25.2Output tokens per second (whole turn)
—Request success
$1.4 / $4.4Vendor API price in / out · per 1M

Included in Borg

At a glance

SpecificationClaude Sonnet 5.5GLM-5.3
ProviderAnthropicZ.ai
Release2026-09-28 Vendor source2026-08-18 Vendor source
Context1,000,000 tokens Vendor source1,048,576 tokens Vendor source
ModalitiesInput: text, image; output: textInput: text; output: text
Reasoning / thinking modesYes / Not publishedYes / Not published
Open weightsNoYes
Vendor API list price / 1M tokens$2 input / $10 output$1.4 input / $4.4 output
BorgIncluded in Borg subscriptionIncluded in Borg subscription

Measured on Borg

Metrics are not directly comparable to vendor benchmark claims. Models served different requests; this is observed gateway traffic, not a controlled head-to-head test.

Time to first token (gateway proxy)

Output tokens per second (whole turn)

MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5GLM-5.3
Time to first token (gateway proxy) p502640 ms (35971 samples)7293 ms (27495 samples)
Tokens per second (end to end) p5076.7 output tokens per second (86888 samples)25.2 output tokens per second (626315 samples)
Request success rateNot publishedNot published
Coding bench pass rateNot published53% (15 samples)
Measurement window, samples and methodology

The fleet reference is the median of published model medians, not a request-weighted result. Prompt lengths, reasoning settings and traffic differ between models.

Claude Sonnet 5.5: Measured on Borg: SearchAtlas AI Gateway production request logs. 30-day window ending 2026-10-08; 94296 requests. Minimum 100 samples per published request metric.

GLM-5.3: Measured on Borg: SearchAtlas AI Gateway production request logs. 30-day window ending 2026-10-08; 659807 requests. Minimum 100 samples per published request metric.

Completion speed covers the whole turn including queueing and reasoning time; it is not a streaming tokens-per-second figure.

  • Time to first token (gateway proxy): time until the first streamed response event reaches the gateway; our closest available measure of time to first token
  • Tokens per second (end to end): tokens per second, end to end: provider-reported output tokens divided by the whole turn's elapsed time, including queueing and reasoning; not a streaming per-token rate

How to choose

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is listed for well-scoped bug fixes and code reviews, whereas GLM-5.3 is listed for complex coding-agent tasks. Choosing between Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM-5.3 requires checking published specifications against observed Borg traffic for your workflow.

Key differences

SpecClaude Sonnet 5.5GLM-5.3
Context window1,000,000 tokens Vendor source1,048,576 tokens Vendor source Larger context
Reasoning modesYes / Not publishedYes / Not published
Release date2026-09-28 Vendor source2026-08-18 Vendor source
API price input / 1M21.4 Lower listed rate
API price output / 1M104.4 Lower listed rate
Time to first token (gateway proxy)2640 ms (35971 samples) Lower median7293 ms (27495 samples)
Output tokens per second (whole turn)76.7 output tokens/s (whole turn) (86888 samples) Higher measured rate25.2 output tokens/s (whole turn) (626315 samples)
Request successNot publishedNot published
Coding benchNot published53% (15 samples)

FAQ

How do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM-5.3 compare for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 has a Borg coding benchmark of not published; GLM-5.3 has 53.33% pass rate across 15 samples and 3 tasks. The Claude Sonnet 5.5–GLM-5.3 coding comparison cannot establish an overall winner from this small test alone.

How quickly do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM-5.3 start responding on Borg?

Borg median first response for Claude Sonnet 5.5 is 2,640 ms; for GLM-5.3 it is 7,293 ms. The Claude Sonnet 5.5–GLM-5.3 gateway medians are observations, not guaranteed latency for individual requests.

What are the API prices for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM-5.3?

The listed API rate for Claude Sonnet 5.5 is $2 input / $10 output per 1M tokens; for GLM-5.3 it is $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens. Neither Claude Sonnet 5.5 nor GLM-5.3 has its Borg subscription charge represented by those provider API rates. Claude Sonnet 5.5 vendor source · GLM-5.3 vendor source

Explore both models

Claude Sonnet 5.5 · GLM-5.3 · Borg pricing

More comparisons

All comparisons