Model comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Compare published specifications, vendor API list prices and measured Borg performance. Both models are included in Borg.

Claude Opus 5.5

1,000,000 tokensContext window
2946 msMedian time to first token (gateway proxy)
60Output tokens per second (whole turn)
—Request success
$4 / $20Vendor API price in / out · per 1M

Claude Sonnet 5.5

1,000,000 tokensContext window
2640 msMedian time to first token (gateway proxy)
76.7Output tokens per second (whole turn)
—Request success
$2 / $10Vendor API price in / out · per 1M

Included in Borg

At a glance

SpecificationClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Release2026-09-22 Vendor source2026-09-28 Vendor source
Context1,000,000 tokens Vendor source1,000,000 tokens Vendor source
ModalitiesInput: text, image; output: textInput: text, image; output: text
Reasoning / thinking modesYes / Not publishedYes / Not published
Open weightsNoNo
Vendor API list price / 1M tokens$4 input / $20 output$2 input / $10 output
BorgIncluded in Borg subscriptionIncluded in Borg subscription

Measured on Borg

Metrics are not directly comparable to vendor benchmark claims. Models served different requests; this is observed gateway traffic, not a controlled head-to-head test.

Time to first token (gateway proxy)

Output tokens per second (whole turn)

MetricClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5
Time to first token (gateway proxy) p502946 ms (75410 samples)2640 ms (35971 samples)
Tokens per second (end to end) p5060 output tokens per second (203387 samples)76.7 output tokens per second (86888 samples)
Request success rateNot publishedNot published
Coding bench pass rateNot publishedNot published
Measurement window, samples and methodology

The fleet reference is the median of published model medians, not a request-weighted result. Prompt lengths, reasoning settings and traffic differ between models.

Claude Opus 5.5: Measured on Borg: SearchAtlas AI Gateway production request logs. 30-day window ending 2026-10-08; 220887 requests. Minimum 100 samples per published request metric.

Claude Sonnet 5.5: Measured on Borg: SearchAtlas AI Gateway production request logs. 30-day window ending 2026-10-08; 94296 requests. Minimum 100 samples per published request metric.

Completion speed covers the whole turn including queueing and reasoning time; it is not a streaming tokens-per-second figure.

  • Time to first token (gateway proxy): time until the first streamed response event reaches the gateway; our closest available measure of time to first token
  • Tokens per second (end to end): tokens per second, end to end: provider-reported output tokens divided by the whole turn's elapsed time, including queueing and reasoning; not a streaming per-token rate

Vendor benchmarks

Vendor-reported scores may use different settings; do not treat them as a controlled head-to-head test.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5
Terminal-Bench 4.066.4%70.6%
CursorBench 4.057.8%55.5%
Humanity’s Last Exam (with tools)67.7%64.5%

How to choose

Claude Opus 5.5 is listed for long-running agentic coding across repositories, whereas Claude Sonnet 5.5 is listed for well-scoped bug fixes and code reviews. Choosing between Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 requires checking published specifications against observed Borg traffic for your workflow.

Key differences

SpecClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5
Context window1,000,000 tokens Vendor source1,000,000 tokens Vendor source
Reasoning modesYes / Not publishedYes / Not published
Release date2026-09-22 Vendor source2026-09-28 Vendor source
API price input / 1M42 Lower listed rate
API price output / 1M2010 Lower listed rate
Time to first token (gateway proxy)2946 ms (75410 samples)2640 ms (35971 samples) Lower median
Output tokens per second (whole turn)60 output tokens/s (whole turn) (203387 samples)76.7 output tokens/s (whole turn) (86888 samples) Higher measured rate
Request successNot publishedNot published
Coding benchNot publishedNot published

FAQ

How do Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 compare for coding?

Claude Opus 5.5 has a Borg coding benchmark of not published; Claude Sonnet 5.5 has not published. The Claude Opus 5.5–Claude Sonnet 5.5 coding comparison cannot establish an overall winner from this small test alone.

How quickly do Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 start responding on Borg?

Borg median first response for Claude Opus 5.5 is 2,946 ms; for Claude Sonnet 5.5 it is 2,640 ms. The Claude Opus 5.5–Claude Sonnet 5.5 gateway medians are observations, not guaranteed latency for individual requests.

What are the API prices for Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Sonnet 5.5?

The listed API rate for Claude Opus 5.5 is $4 input / $20 output per 1M tokens; for Claude Sonnet 5.5 it is $2 input / $10 output per 1M tokens. Neither Claude Opus 5.5 nor Claude Sonnet 5.5 has its Borg subscription charge represented by those provider API rates. Claude Opus 5.5 vendor source · Claude Sonnet 5.5 vendor source

Explore both models

Claude Opus 5.5 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Borg pricing

More comparisons

All comparisons