Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Compare published specifications, vendor API list prices and measured Borg performance. Both models are included in Borg.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

1,000,000 tokensContext window
2640 msMedian time to first token (gateway proxy)
76.7Output tokens per second (whole turn)
—Request success
$2 / $10Vendor API price in / out · per 1M

Gemini 3.1 Pro

1,048,576 tokensContext window
—Median time to first token (gateway proxy)
—Output tokens per second (whole turn)
—Request success
$2 / $12Vendor API price in / out · per 1M

Included in Borg

At a glance

SpecificationClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3.1 Pro
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Release2026-09-28 Vendor source2026-02-19 Vendor source
Context1,000,000 tokens Vendor source1,048,576 tokens Vendor source
ModalitiesInput: text, image; output: textInput: text, image, video, audio, pdf; output: text
Reasoning / thinking modesYes / Not publishedYes / Not published
Open weightsNoNo
Vendor API list price / 1M tokens$2 input / $10 output$2 input / $12 output Rates for prompts of at most 200,000 tokens; longer prompts cost more.
BorgIncluded in Borg subscriptionIncluded in Borg subscription

Measured on Borg

Metrics are not directly comparable to vendor benchmark claims. Models served different requests; this is observed gateway traffic, not a controlled head-to-head test.

Time to first token (gateway proxy)

Output tokens per second (whole turn)

MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3.1 Pro
Time to first token (gateway proxy) p502640 ms (35971 samples)Not published
Tokens per second (end to end) p5076.7 output tokens per second (86888 samples)Not published
Request success rateNot publishedNot published
Coding bench pass rateNot publishedNot published
Measurement window, samples and methodology

The fleet reference is the median of published model medians, not a request-weighted result. Prompt lengths, reasoning settings and traffic differ between models.

Claude Sonnet 5.5: Measured on Borg: SearchAtlas AI Gateway production request logs. 30-day window ending 2026-10-08; 94296 requests. Minimum 100 samples per published request metric.

Gemini 3.1 Pro: Measured on Borg: SearchAtlas AI Gateway production request logs. 30-day window ending 2026-10-08; 278 requests. Minimum 100 samples per published request metric.

Completion speed covers the whole turn including queueing and reasoning time; it is not a streaming tokens-per-second figure.

  • Time to first token (gateway proxy): time until the first streamed response event reaches the gateway; our closest available measure of time to first token
  • Tokens per second (end to end): tokens per second, end to end: provider-reported output tokens divided by the whole turn's elapsed time, including queueing and reasoning; not a streaming per-token rate

How to choose

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is listed for well-scoped bug fixes and code reviews, whereas Gemini 3.1 Pro is listed for complex software engineering. Choosing between Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro requires checking published specifications against observed Borg traffic for your workflow.

Key differences

SpecClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3.1 Pro
Context window1,000,000 tokens Vendor source1,048,576 tokens Vendor source Larger context
Reasoning modesYes / Not publishedYes / Not published
Release date2026-09-28 Vendor source2026-02-19 Vendor source
API price input / 1M22 Rates for prompts of at most 200,000 tokens; longer prompts cost more.
API price output / 1M10 Lower listed rate12 Rates for prompts of at most 200,000 tokens; longer prompts cost more.
Time to first token (gateway proxy)2640 ms (35971 samples)Not published
Output tokens per second (whole turn)76.7 output tokens/s (whole turn) (86888 samples)Not published
Request successNot publishedNot published
Coding benchNot publishedNot published

FAQ

How do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro compare for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 has a Borg coding benchmark of not published; Gemini 3.1 Pro has not published. The Claude Sonnet 5.5–Gemini 3.1 Pro coding comparison cannot establish an overall winner from this small test alone.

How quickly do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro start responding on Borg?

Borg median first response for Claude Sonnet 5.5 is 2,640 ms; for Gemini 3.1 Pro it is not published. The Claude Sonnet 5.5–Gemini 3.1 Pro gateway medians are observations, not guaranteed latency for individual requests.

What are the API prices for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro?

The listed API rate for Claude Sonnet 5.5 is $2 input / $10 output per 1M tokens; for Gemini 3.1 Pro it is $2 input / $12 output per 1M tokens. Neither Claude Sonnet 5.5 nor Gemini 3.1 Pro has its Borg subscription charge represented by those provider API rates. Claude Sonnet 5.5 vendor source · Gemini 3.1 Pro vendor source

Explore both models

Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 3.1 Pro · Borg pricing

More comparisons

All comparisons