Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Compare published specifications, vendor API list prices and measured Borg performance. Both models are included in Borg.

Claude Haiku 4.5

200,000 tokensContext window
889 msMedian time to first token (gateway proxy)
64.9Output tokens per second (whole turn)
—Request success
$1 / $5Vendor API price in / out · per 1M

Kimi K2.7 Code

262,144 tokensContext window
4780 msMedian time to first token (gateway proxy)
24.2Output tokens per second (whole turn)
—Request success
$0.95 / $4Vendor API price in / out · per 1M

Included in Borg

At a glance

SpecificationClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2.7 Code
ProviderAnthropicMoonshot AI
Release2025-10-15 Vendor source—
Context200,000 tokens Vendor source262,144 tokens Vendor source
ModalitiesInput: text, image; output: textInput: text, image, video; output: Not published
Reasoning / thinking modesYes / Not publishedYes / Not published
Open weightsNoYes
Vendor API list price / 1M tokens$1 input / $5 output$0.95 input / $4 output
BorgIncluded in Borg subscriptionIncluded in Borg subscription

Not published by the vendor: release.

Measured on Borg

Metrics are not directly comparable to vendor benchmark claims. Models served different requests; this is observed gateway traffic, not a controlled head-to-head test.

Time to first token (gateway proxy)

Output tokens per second (whole turn)

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2.7 Code
Time to first token (gateway proxy) p50889 ms (6197 samples)4780 ms (119 samples)
Tokens per second (end to end) p5064.9 output tokens per second (226302 samples)24.2 output tokens per second (1894 samples)
Request success rateNot publishedNot published
Coding bench pass rateNot publishedNot published
Measurement window, samples and methodology

The fleet reference is the median of published model medians, not a request-weighted result. Prompt lengths, reasoning settings and traffic differ between models.

Claude Haiku 4.5: Measured on Borg: SearchAtlas AI Gateway production request logs. 30-day window ending 2026-10-08; 289125 requests. Minimum 100 samples per published request metric.

Kimi K2.7 Code: Measured on Borg: SearchAtlas AI Gateway production request logs. 30-day window ending 2026-10-08; 2583 requests. Minimum 100 samples per published request metric.

Completion speed covers the whole turn including queueing and reasoning time; it is not a streaming tokens-per-second figure.

  • Time to first token (gateway proxy): time until the first streamed response event reaches the gateway; our closest available measure of time to first token
  • Tokens per second (end to end): tokens per second, end to end: provider-reported output tokens divided by the whole turn's elapsed time, including queueing and reasoning; not a streaming per-token rate

How to choose

Claude Haiku 4.5 is listed for high-volume classification and tagging, whereas Kimi K2.7 Code is listed for multi-file coding with iterative test runs. Choosing between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2.7 Code requires checking published specifications against observed Borg traffic for your workflow.

Key differences

SpecClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2.7 Code
Context window200,000 tokens Vendor source262,144 tokens Vendor source Larger context
Reasoning modesYes / Not publishedYes / Not published
Release date2025-10-15 Vendor sourceNot published
API price input / 1M10.95 Lower listed rate
API price output / 1M54 Lower listed rate
Time to first token (gateway proxy)889 ms (6197 samples) Lower median4780 ms (119 samples)
Output tokens per second (whole turn)64.9 output tokens/s (whole turn) (226302 samples) Higher measured rate24.2 output tokens/s (whole turn) (1894 samples)
Request successNot publishedNot published
Coding benchNot publishedNot published

FAQ

How do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2.7 Code compare for coding?

Claude Haiku 4.5 has a Borg coding benchmark of not published; Kimi K2.7 Code has not published. The Claude Haiku 4.5–Kimi K2.7 Code coding comparison cannot establish an overall winner from this small test alone.

How quickly do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2.7 Code start responding on Borg?

Borg median first response for Claude Haiku 4.5 is 889 ms; for Kimi K2.7 Code it is 4,780 ms. The Claude Haiku 4.5–Kimi K2.7 Code gateway medians are observations, not guaranteed latency for individual requests.

What are the API prices for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2.7 Code?

The listed API rate for Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1 input / $5 output per 1M tokens; for Kimi K2.7 Code it is $0.95 input / $4 output per 1M tokens. Neither Claude Haiku 4.5 nor Kimi K2.7 Code has its Borg subscription charge represented by those provider API rates. Claude Haiku 4.5 vendor source · Kimi K2.7 Code vendor source

Explore both models

Claude Haiku 4.5 · Kimi K2.7 Code · Borg pricing

More comparisons

All comparisons