Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Compare published specifications, vendor API list prices and measured Borg performance. Both models are included in Borg.

Claude Haiku 4.5

200,000 tokensContext window
889 msMedian time to first token (gateway proxy)
64.9Output tokens per second (whole turn)
—Request success
$1 / $5Vendor API price in / out · per 1M

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

1,048,576 tokensContext window
1572 msMedian time to first token (gateway proxy)
59.2Output tokens per second (whole turn)
100%Request success
$0.3 / $2.5Vendor API price in / out · per 1M

Included in Borg

At a glance

SpecificationClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Release2025-10-15 Vendor source2026-07-21 Vendor source
Context200,000 tokens Vendor source1,048,576 tokens Vendor source
ModalitiesInput: text, image; output: textInput: text, image, video, audio, pdf; output: text
Reasoning / thinking modesYes / Not publishedYes / Not published
Open weightsNoNo
Vendor API list price / 1M tokens$1 input / $5 output$0.3 input / $2.5 output
BorgIncluded in Borg subscriptionIncluded in Borg subscription

Measured on Borg

Metrics are not directly comparable to vendor benchmark claims. Models served different requests; this is observed gateway traffic, not a controlled head-to-head test.

Time to first token (gateway proxy)

Output tokens per second (whole turn)

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Time to first token (gateway proxy) p50889 ms (6197 samples)1572 ms (33554 samples)
Tokens per second (end to end) p5064.9 output tokens per second (226302 samples)59.2 output tokens per second (197556 samples)
Request success rateNot published100% (38840 samples)
Coding bench pass rateNot publishedNot published
Measurement window, samples and methodology

The fleet reference is the median of published model medians, not a request-weighted result. Prompt lengths, reasoning settings and traffic differ between models.

Claude Haiku 4.5: Measured on Borg: SearchAtlas AI Gateway production request logs. 30-day window ending 2026-10-08; 289125 requests. Minimum 100 samples per published request metric.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: Measured on Borg: SearchAtlas AI Gateway production request logs. 30-day window ending 2026-10-08; 216821 requests. Minimum 100 samples per published request metric.

Completion speed covers the whole turn including queueing and reasoning time; it is not a streaming tokens-per-second figure.

  • Time to first token (gateway proxy): time until the first streamed response event reaches the gateway; our closest available measure of time to first token
  • Tokens per second (end to end): tokens per second, end to end: provider-reported output tokens divided by the whole turn's elapsed time, including queueing and reasoning; not a streaming per-token rate

How to choose

Claude Haiku 4.5 is listed for high-volume classification and tagging, whereas Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is listed for high-throughput document parsing. Choosing between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite requires checking published specifications against observed Borg traffic for your workflow.

Key differences

SpecClaude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Context window200,000 tokens Vendor source1,048,576 tokens Vendor source Larger context
Reasoning modesYes / Not publishedYes / Not published
Release date2025-10-15 Vendor source2026-07-21 Vendor source
API price input / 1M10.3 Lower listed rate
API price output / 1M52.5 Lower listed rate
Time to first token (gateway proxy)889 ms (6197 samples) Lower median1572 ms (33554 samples)
Output tokens per second (whole turn)64.9 output tokens/s (whole turn) (226302 samples) Higher measured rate59.2 output tokens/s (whole turn) (197556 samples)
Request successNot published100% (38840 samples)
Coding benchNot publishedNot published

FAQ

How do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite compare for coding?

Claude Haiku 4.5 has a Borg coding benchmark of not published; Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has not published. The Claude Haiku 4.5–Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite coding comparison cannot establish an overall winner from this small test alone.

How quickly do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite start responding on Borg?

Borg median first response for Claude Haiku 4.5 is 889 ms; for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite it is 1,572 ms. The Claude Haiku 4.5–Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite gateway medians are observations, not guaranteed latency for individual requests.

What are the API prices for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

The listed API rate for Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1 input / $5 output per 1M tokens; for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite it is $0.3 input / $2.5 output per 1M tokens. Neither Claude Haiku 4.5 nor Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has its Borg subscription charge represented by those provider API rates. Claude Haiku 4.5 vendor source · Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vendor source

Explore both models

Claude Haiku 4.5 · Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · Borg pricing

More comparisons

All comparisons